<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inbox Zero is Hard for Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Marculescu</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32434</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Marculescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32434</guid>
		<description>I started keeping my inbox on a diet last year and I&#039;m pretty happy with the results so far: http://blog.teamness.com/2008/09/keep-your-inbox-on-diet.html

Also using starred item in Gmail helps a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started keeping my inbox on a diet last year and I&#8217;m pretty happy with the results so far: <a href="http://blog.teamness.com/2008/09/keep-your-inbox-on-diet.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.teamness.com/2008/09/keep-your-inbox-on-diet.html</a></p>
<p>Also using starred item in Gmail helps a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t think of a banana stress&#8230; &#171; me.andering</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32229</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t think of a banana stress&#8230; &#171; me.andering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32229</guid>
		<description>[...] if you take just one part, it might cause you stress. For instance, Johanna Rothman just wrote how Inbox zero is hard for her. GTD states that you should end every day with an empty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you take just one part, it might cause you stress. For instance, Johanna Rothman just wrote how Inbox zero is hard for her. GTD states that you should end every day with an empty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Haden</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32215</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Haden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32215</guid>
		<description>Admittedly, I haven&#039;t read Merlin&#039;s Inbox Zero piece, although I just gave his key points a quick review. With that disclaimer, I&#039;m not convinced that my inbox has to go to zero items. 

My early strategy as a team lead of a development team was to file in folders but it was  a large investment of time. 

My recent strategy of late was to have a good search tool and work with three &quot;folders&quot; - Inbox, Sent, and Deleted. In other words, leave it in your Inbox, flag items for follow-up or reference, archive the Inbox every &#039;n&#039; days, and have the archive folders available in Outlook and accessible for smart folders and search functionality.

For Outlook 2003, the good search tool was Lookout which MS purchased and incorporated into Outlook 2007. In combination with Xobni, a combination of quick searches and flagged items has helped me lessen my inbox admin time, and focus on being able to follow up and access reference items.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admittedly, I haven&#8217;t read Merlin&#8217;s Inbox Zero piece, although I just gave his key points a quick review. With that disclaimer, I&#8217;m not convinced that my inbox has to go to zero items. </p>
<p>My early strategy as a team lead of a development team was to file in folders but it was  a large investment of time. </p>
<p>My recent strategy of late was to have a good search tool and work with three &#8220;folders&#8221; &#8211; Inbox, Sent, and Deleted. In other words, leave it in your Inbox, flag items for follow-up or reference, archive the Inbox every &#8216;n&#8217; days, and have the archive folders available in Outlook and accessible for smart folders and search functionality.</p>
<p>For Outlook 2003, the good search tool was Lookout which MS purchased and incorporated into Outlook 2007. In combination with Xobni, a combination of quick searches and flagged items has helped me lessen my inbox admin time, and focus on being able to follow up and access reference items.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willem van den Ende</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32212</link>
		<dc:creator>Willem van den Ende</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32212</guid>
		<description>I have 1 as well. With e-mail as well as paper. I&#039;ve started scanning paper, but even that piles up (not everything scans as easily). 
Over christmas I&#039;ve been thinking about creating a WTF box, and emptying that every once in a while if I still don&#039;t know what to do with it. And alternatively, spend some 5 why time to figure out why I did not know what to do with that particular thing.
To me, GTD underestimates the emotional impact that some (a minority, but it keeps piling up) incoming things have - doesn&#039;t stay contained in two minutes but goes half consciously into background processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 1 as well. With e-mail as well as paper. I&#8217;ve started scanning paper, but even that piles up (not everything scans as easily).<br />
Over christmas I&#8217;ve been thinking about creating a WTF box, and emptying that every once in a while if I still don&#8217;t know what to do with it. And alternatively, spend some 5 why time to figure out why I did not know what to do with that particular thing.<br />
To me, GTD underestimates the emotional impact that some (a minority, but it keeps piling up) incoming things have &#8211; doesn&#8217;t stay contained in two minutes but goes half consciously into background processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32200</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32200</guid>
		<description>Talking about inboxes for me the biggest pain in the neck are threads where I need some input from someone else and I know I can&#039;t be sure to get without a couple of reminders.

Since my inbox works as my todo list too I don&#039;t trash those threads and the list tends to grow to something between one and three screens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about inboxes for me the biggest pain in the neck are threads where I need some input from someone else and I know I can&#8217;t be sure to get without a couple of reminders.</p>
<p>Since my inbox works as my todo list too I don&#8217;t trash those threads and the list tends to grow to something between one and three screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnon Rotem-Gal-Oz</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32168</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnon Rotem-Gal-Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32168</guid>
		<description>I work with &quot;Get Things Done&quot; http://www.gtdinbox.com/ to take care of email and keep my inbox empty or near empty

Arnon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with &#8220;Get Things Done&#8221; <a href="http://www.gtdinbox.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gtdinbox.com/</a> to take care of email and keep my inbox empty or near empty</p>
<p>Arnon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoninTDK</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2009/01/inbox-zero-is-hard-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-32164</link>
		<dc:creator>RoninTDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8600#comment-32164</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t know for sure but it sounds as though you&#039;re misapplying the inbox zero principle.
You had 6 emails this morning. reading an email should take a minute or 2 and either go do the task right away (if it takes less than 2 minutes) or reply immediately (if that takes less than 2 minutes) or put it in your system (as reference or task or project). 

So I don&#039;t see how it should take you more than about 15 minutes at most to process all 6 and that is assuming that each contains a less than 2 minute task or reply, otherwise it should take you even less time.

Also be aware that writing a longer reply (normally, the reason it takes longer than 2 minutes is that you need to look up data or talk to someone or first figure out the answer) it should actually be a project/NA in your system. If you look at your projects list and think you have more important things to do, you can also decide to make replying to that email a Someday/Maybe projects or simply to not reply or to write a short &quot;sorry, i don&#039;t know / have time&quot; reply. 

If you&#039;re gonna spend less than 2 minutes an a mail, just do it.
If you&#039;re gonna spend more than 2 minutes, you need to consider it a task and put it in your system, where it will be considered as one of the many things you could do. Maybe you&#039;ll see that you have more important stuff to do and eventually not reply or only much later. That&#039;s acceptable. GTD is not about magically bending the space-time continuum or creating more time. It&#039;s about doing the most important first, so in the end there is no regret (You had a limited amount of time and you did the most important things. What else could you have done?)

I&#039;m thinking this posts is starting to exceed your original post in length (can&#039;t really say because this box is so damn small :P) so sorry for that. Hopefully it&#039;s somewhat helpful ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t know for sure but it sounds as though you&#8217;re misapplying the inbox zero principle.<br />
You had 6 emails this morning. reading an email should take a minute or 2 and either go do the task right away (if it takes less than 2 minutes) or reply immediately (if that takes less than 2 minutes) or put it in your system (as reference or task or project). </p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t see how it should take you more than about 15 minutes at most to process all 6 and that is assuming that each contains a less than 2 minute task or reply, otherwise it should take you even less time.</p>
<p>Also be aware that writing a longer reply (normally, the reason it takes longer than 2 minutes is that you need to look up data or talk to someone or first figure out the answer) it should actually be a project/NA in your system. If you look at your projects list and think you have more important things to do, you can also decide to make replying to that email a Someday/Maybe projects or simply to not reply or to write a short &#8220;sorry, i don&#8217;t know / have time&#8221; reply. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re gonna spend less than 2 minutes an a mail, just do it.<br />
If you&#8217;re gonna spend more than 2 minutes, you need to consider it a task and put it in your system, where it will be considered as one of the many things you could do. Maybe you&#8217;ll see that you have more important stuff to do and eventually not reply or only much later. That&#8217;s acceptable. GTD is not about magically bending the space-time continuum or creating more time. It&#8217;s about doing the most important first, so in the end there is no regret (You had a limited amount of time and you did the most important things. What else could you have done?)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking this posts is starting to exceed your original post in length (can&#8217;t really say because this box is so damn small :P) so sorry for that. Hopefully it&#8217;s somewhat helpful ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
