<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Attempt to Define Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-21161</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8477#comment-21161</guid>
		<description>I'm on Chet's side.  Value is an assessment made by a person at a point in time saying, "My concerns are better taken care of then they were before I received (whatever).  It's important to note the temporality of the assessment.  A report at one might be assessed as of value by the client while later the report is just waste.  Further, standards shift through time.  A team listening carefully to a client may be surprised to find out their happy client is no longer happy only due to the client discovering that s/he could be getting something more than the team has been providing.

Portfolio managers need to stay close to the client of the projects to see that the intended value is being assessed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on Chet&#8217;s side.  Value is an assessment made by a person at a point in time saying, &#8220;My concerns are better taken care of then they were before I received (whatever).  It&#8217;s important to note the temporality of the assessment.  A report at one might be assessed as of value by the client while later the report is just waste.  Further, standards shift through time.  A team listening carefully to a client may be surprised to find out their happy client is no longer happy only due to the client discovering that s/he could be getting something more than the team has been providing.</p>
<p>Portfolio managers need to stay close to the client of the projects to see that the intended value is being assessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ward</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-21050</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8477#comment-21050</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure that I totally agree with Chet Frame. If the result we are trying to achieve may not be apparent, how will we ever know if we have achieved. I believe that benefits, or value, just like cost, must be highly visible. It should be evident to all whether these have been attained. If you had substituted "quality" for value, I might have tended to agree more, but not completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I totally agree with Chet Frame. If the result we are trying to achieve may not be apparent, how will we ever know if we have achieved. I believe that benefits, or value, just like cost, must be highly visible. It should be evident to all whether these have been attained. If you had substituted &#8220;quality&#8221; for value, I might have tended to agree more, but not completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet Frame</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-20845</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet Frame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8477#comment-20845</guid>
		<description>Remember that value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder, but in the case of value the beholder needs to be the customer.  ROI and numbers work well for the financial set, but most customers are buying a service or a program to reach an end that may not be apparent.  Help them get what they want and they will appreciate the value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder, but in the case of value the beholder needs to be the customer.  ROI and numbers work well for the financial set, but most customers are buying a service or a program to reach an end that may not be apparent.  Help them get what they want and they will appreciate the value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Edstrom</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/08/an-attempt-to-define-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-20691</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Edstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8477#comment-20691</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post! I find that often value is confused with an over-the-top process. Instead of building value, we build a wonderful process and hope that value will emerge somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post! I find that often value is confused with an over-the-top process. Instead of building value, we build a wonderful process and hope that value will emerge somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
