<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is a Scrum Master (or a PM) Not?</title>
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4362</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4362</guid>
		<description>@ Craig: 
"Won’t an experienced and talented team just deliver regardless of the process?"

In what I have seen in my own experience... Not all the time! They have to follow 'some' process and they may pull it off, somehow, but the effort would have been so much easier if everyone followed the same set of rules/guidelines/framework, whatever. 

"ANd doesn’t that indicate that the process is relatively unimportant?"

Process is only as important as much it helps you to deliver. So, I would say that I disagree with your conclusion. 

Now, if you are talking about a process that exists just for the sake of process and not helping in delivering value... then you have a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Craig:<br />
&#8220;Won’t an experienced and talented team just deliver regardless of the process?&#8221;</p>
<p>In what I have seen in my own experience&#8230; Not all the time! They have to follow &#8217;some&#8217; process and they may pull it off, somehow, but the effort would have been so much easier if everyone followed the same set of rules/guidelines/framework, whatever. </p>
<p>&#8220;ANd doesn’t that indicate that the process is relatively unimportant?&#8221;</p>
<p>Process is only as important as much it helps you to deliver. So, I would say that I disagree with your conclusion. </p>
<p>Now, if you are talking about a process that exists just for the sake of process and not helping in delivering value&#8230; then you have a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Brown</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>Process, process, process.

What about people?  At the end of the day the process is just one of several enabers (alongside culture, technology and tools, etc.)

Won't an experienced and talented team just deliver regardless of the process?  ANd doesn't that indicate that the process is relatively unimportant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Process, process, process.</p>
<p>What about people?  At the end of the day the process is just one of several enabers (alongside culture, technology and tools, etc.)</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t an experienced and talented team just deliver regardless of the process?  ANd doesn&#8217;t that indicate that the process is relatively unimportant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Emond</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Emond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>I agree with Johanna. PMs have to be the guardians of the PM process they want to use. Project stakeholders that pretend to work on the team should accept to control their own actions within the process proposed and negotiated with the PM. You ask someone to facilitate a Scrum, you should trust him/her with the process and not try to denature it because it is new to you. Pms are not only facilitarors, thay also have to show the way, project-process wise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Johanna. PMs have to be the guardians of the PM process they want to use. Project stakeholders that pretend to work on the team should accept to control their own actions within the process proposed and negotiated with the PM. You ask someone to facilitate a Scrum, you should trust him/her with the process and not try to denature it because it is new to you. Pms are not only facilitarors, thay also have to show the way, project-process wise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Yip</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4018</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2008/01/when-is-a-scrum-master-or-a-pm-not.html#comment-4018</guid>
		<description>I'm wary of "Effective PMs control the project's process" as I would expect the people actually doing the work to control their own process.  I'd expect effective PMs/Scrum Masters/whatever to facilitate, engage, influence, etc. so that this can happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wary of &#8220;Effective PMs control the project&#8217;s process&#8221; as I would expect the people actually doing the work to control their own process.  I&#8217;d expect effective PMs/Scrum Masters/whatever to facilitate, engage, influence, etc. so that this can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
