<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strengthening Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lb</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>lb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-567</guid>
		<description>nice article. i love how you struck out the weak and indirect words.
my favourite words to kill are any that end with "-ly".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article. i love how you struck out the weak and indirect words.<br />
my favourite words to kill are any that end with &#8220;-ly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I just completed a 16 session intensive course on "Mastering English Grammer and Punctuation."  I'm a native English speaker and thought I was a good writer.  The course was hard work; it reminded me  how much I had forgotten, and my writing improved significantly.
I recommend grammar girl at http://grammar.qdnow.com/ .
Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just completed a 16 session intensive course on &#8220;Mastering English Grammer and Punctuation.&#8221;  I&#8217;m a native English speaker and thought I was a good writer.  The course was hard work; it reminded me  how much I had forgotten, and my writing improved significantly.<br />
I recommend grammar girl at <a href="http://grammar.qdnow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://grammar.qdnow.com/</a> .<br />
Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Schophuizen</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Schophuizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I have struggled with the same. My words are "And", "But", "So","Now", "Therefore" and many more.
(But) I am not an native English speaker, or writer. My fear is to break the flow of reading, making text "square", not fluid.
Your examples illustrate the opposite. Instead of disrupting the flow, those extra words seem like someone is talking without taking a breath between the sentences. As a listener you get out of breath listening. Removing those words is like adding bars to music: it structures the blur of sound.
(But) Reviewing ones own writing may be a natural thing for bookwriters (and article writers), but engineers are more interested in the information content than the information format. How can we teach technical people to be/become more considerate about the reader of their writing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have struggled with the same. My words are &#8220;And&#8221;, &#8220;But&#8221;, &#8220;So&#8221;,&#8221;Now&#8221;, &#8220;Therefore&#8221; and many more.<br />
(But) I am not an native English speaker, or writer. My fear is to break the flow of reading, making text &#8220;square&#8221;, not fluid.<br />
Your examples illustrate the opposite. Instead of disrupting the flow, those extra words seem like someone is talking without taking a breath between the sentences. As a listener you get out of breath listening. Removing those words is like adding bars to music: it structures the blur of sound.<br />
(But) Reviewing ones own writing may be a natural thing for bookwriters (and article writers), but engineers are more interested in the information content than the information format. How can we teach technical people to be/become more considerate about the reader of their writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
