<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interventions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/interventions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/interventions.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/interventions.html#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8117#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Johanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Johanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna Rothman</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/interventions.html#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8117#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Wayne, *in my experience*, no, the Six Sigma folks do not measure feedback times. I'm a big fan of Fault Feedback Ratio. I tried to introduce that to a Six Sigma program I was consulting with and they told me that data was "irrelevant." I'm mystified.
Too often the numbers that people produce are not predictive, which is why they are not useful to measure. The numbers that are predictive are useful to measure.
And, read Don's afterword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne, *in my experience*, no, the Six Sigma folks do not measure feedback times. I&#8217;m a big fan of Fault Feedback Ratio. I tried to introduce that to a Six Sigma program I was consulting with and they told me that data was &#8220;irrelevant.&#8221; I&#8217;m mystified.<br />
Too often the numbers that people produce are not predictive, which is why they are not useful to measure. The numbers that are predictive are useful to measure.<br />
And, read Don&#8217;s afterword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Froese</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/interventions.html#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Froese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8117#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I am only partway through the article and had to solicit more comments.
Are any of you involved in Six Sigma stuff? What are your thoughts on the comment "Mostly, the numbers are not worth the sweat put into them." and Meadows reasons for saying so? Is Six Sigma concerned with measuring time to feedback?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am only partway through the article and had to solicit more comments.<br />
Are any of you involved in Six Sigma stuff? What are your thoughts on the comment &#8220;Mostly, the numbers are not worth the sweat put into them.&#8221; and Meadows reasons for saying so? Is Six Sigma concerned with measuring time to feedback?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
