<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low-Tech Scheduling for Projects is Similar to Paper Prototypes for Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2004/05/low-tech-scheduling-for-projects-is-similar-to-paper-prototypes-for-design.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2004/05/low-tech-scheduling-for-projects-is-similar-to-paper-prototypes-for-design.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lui Sieh JD PMP</title>
		<link>http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2004/05/low-tech-scheduling-for-projects-is-similar-to-paper-prototypes-for-design.html#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Lui Sieh JD PMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8258#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assessments about scheduling.  Sometimes the most basic lo-tech tools are actually best to visually understand what's going on.
Once I did this, I chucked pretty much all electronic scheduling tools unless I had to (because customer).
BR,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessments about scheduling.  Sometimes the most basic lo-tech tools are actually best to visually understand what&#8217;s going on.<br />
Once I did this, I chucked pretty much all electronic scheduling tools unless I had to (because customer).<br />
BR,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
